# Global Extension Auditor Report

## Auditor posture

This report scrutinizes the global web/mobile/AI/quantum extension as an external privacy, security, app-store and legal compliance auditor.

## High-risk findings remediated

1. **Risk:** “All 195 countries” could be interpreted as a guaranteed local legal opinion.  
   **Fix:** Added methodology, source hierarchy and explicit local-counsel requirement.
2. **Risk:** App-store privacy labels often diverge from real code behavior.  
   **Fix:** Added disclosure reconciliation as a hard release blocker and SDK inventory register.
3. **Risk:** Third-party AI data sharing may be omitted from privacy policies and app-store labels.  
   **Fix:** Added third-party AI transfer gate, AI vendor register and AI disclosure policy.
4. **Risk:** Quantum claims are commonly overstated.  
   **Fix:** Added prohibited marketing language and standards-based PQC migration plan.
5. **Risk:** Country matrix may ignore territories and marketplace jurisdictions.  
   **Fix:** Added additional marketplace jurisdiction watchlist.
6. **Risk:** Health, children, biometric and precise-location data require enhanced treatment.  
   **Fix:** Added sensitive-data gates in global controls, policies and registers.
7. **Risk:** Runtime snippets may create false compliance confidence.  
   **Fix:** Marked snippets as helper code only and required server-side enforcement/counsel review.

## Residual risk

Local counsel must still validate product-specific obligations. The highest-risk residual areas are country-specific AI rules, health/medical device classifications, children/youth safety, telecom/SMS marketing, data localization, cryptography/export restrictions, sanctioned countries and app-store country availability.

## Satisfactory for template use under US law

The extension is suitable as a US-law-oriented compliance engineering template for counsel review. It should not be represented as legal advice or as sufficient for launch without product-specific review.