Hospitals
Can this fit beside PACS, EHR, security review, and procurement reality?
Start with workflow boundaries: where the image leaves context, who can review the packet, and what must stay governed before a pilot.
Read deployment notesNEXQ Journal
Field notes for scan-to-plan healthcare.
Publication at NEXQ has one job: make the handoff from image to evidence to care-plan context easier to evaluate. The writing is for hospitals, clinicians, patients, and partners who need less theater and more operational clarity.
Reader paths
Start with the question you brought here.
The Journal should help a serious reader route themselves quickly: hospital deployment, clinician review, patient access, research translation, or private pilot scoping.
Clinicians
Can the output be challenged, explained, and carried into a care-plan conversation?
Read for reviewer visibility: source evidence, confidence, limitations, molecular context, and the handoff from scan to plan.
Explore LiMiQPatients
Can my scan, next steps, and provider conversations stay portable?
Follow the patient-owned scan story: access, authorization, secure communication, and clearer movement between care teams.
View patient accessPublished briefs
Small archive. Real lanes.
The archive is intentionally narrow right now. Each article has to earn its place by clarifying a product lane, a workflow problem, or a claim boundary NEXQ is willing to stand behind.
Indexed articles: 2Primary author: Michelle L. WuPublic claims: evidence-gated
01
HeartQ: Cardiovascular Longevity Research With Boundaries
HeartQ explores cardiovascular longevity questions with quantum and AI-assisted methods while keeping public claims inside research boundaries.
02
TumorQ: Keeping The Oncology Case Together
TumorQ starts with a simple problem: the scan, symptoms, molecular findings, and treatment question often live in different places when time matters most.
Topic map
Where the writing connects to the product.
Search should surface the same structure a reader sees: oncology imaging, evidence posture, cardiovascular research, secure access, and patient-owned scan movement.
Oncology imaging
TumorQ
How imaging, symptoms, molecular constraints, evidence limits, and treatment-pathway questions stay attached for professional review.
glioma MRI workflowscan-to-plan contextoncology review packet
Follow this laneEvidence posture
LiMiQ
How NEXQ frames confidence, uncertainty, citations, and limitation language before a workflow can be trusted.
reviewable AIclaim boundariesclinical evidence layer
Follow this laneCardiovascular research
HeartQ
How cardiovascular longevity ideas stay inside research boundaries while preserving context for professional evaluation.
cardiovascular modelinglongevity researchprofessional review
Follow this laneSecurity and access
Deployment
How role access, audit trails, retention posture, patient-owned scans, and secure provider communication shape pilot readiness.
PACS integrationHIPAA GDPR postureprovider communication
Follow this laneEditorial standards
Precise, human, claim-aware.
NEXQ should never sound like software talking to itself. The editorial voice is quiet, specific, and accountable: what problem is being addressed, what evidence exists, what is still bounded, and what conversation should happen next.
Write from the care moment.
Every brief starts with the clinical or patient workflow before it talks about models, architecture, or roadmap.
Keep claims inside the evidence.
Public language separates product direction from validated performance, regulated use, and clinical reliance.
Make the next step obvious.
Each article links readers to the product, documentation, or private pilot conversation that matches the question.