LiMiQ by NEXQ

Diagnostic output should arrive with its evidence still attached.

LiMiQ is the reviewable evidence layer NEXQ is building around diagnostic-support output: source context, confidence, limitations, reviewer notes, and professional sign-off before a finding becomes part of a care conversation.

How LiMiQ moves

Evidence becomes useful when it can be questioned.

LiMiQ keeps each diagnostic-support claim close to the context a clinician needs to inspect: what informed it, how confident it is, what it cannot know, and what review state it carries.

Scope evidence review
01

Question enters

The workflow begins with the clinical question, patient context, and approved source material.

02

Evidence binds

Source signals, confidence, uncertainty, and limits are attached before a claim is shown.

03

Reviewer sees

The packet exposes what was used, what was not known, and where judgment is required.

04

Plan stays bounded

Care-pathway context moves forward only with governance, intended-use, and review state visible.

05

Record travels

The final packet can support secure provider communication and authorized patient access.

LiMiQ remains a planned diagnostics-workflow concept pending approved data flows, validation, and regulatory review.

Evidence layer

LiMiQ is designed for the messy middle between signal and decision.

Hospitals and clinicians do not only need output. They need the posture around the output: sources, certainty, limitations, review ownership, and whether the packet is ready to inform the next conversation.

Source trail

Signals stay attached.

Imaging context, symptoms, prior notes, molecular signals, and cited evidence remain visible as part of the same diagnostic-support packet.

Confidence

Certainty is not hidden.

Every model-facing claim is designed to carry confidence, uncertainty, known limitations, and reviewer-readable caveats.

Review layer

The clinician can challenge it.

LiMiQ is shaped around professional review, not autonomous reliance: reviewers see what the system used, what it held back, and what still needs judgment.

Plan bridge

Treatment context stays bounded.

Diagnostic-support context can travel toward care-pathway discussion only inside approved governance, intended-use, and regulatory boundaries.

Review workflow

From diagnostic signal to review-ready packet.

LiMiQ gives the review loop a calmer structure: gather the context, bind the evidence, expose uncertainty, and move forward only when the governance state is clear.

Source-awareConfidence-visibleReviewer-bound
  1. 01

    Gather authorized patient context, imaging references, and the diagnostic question before any output is trusted.

  2. 02

    Attach source signals, confidence language, and limitation notes to each diagnostic-support claim.

  3. 03

    Route the packet through professional review so clinicians can accept, challenge, or hold the output.

  4. 04

    Move only approved context toward treatment-planning discussion, with privacy, access, retention, and audit posture visible.

Why NEXQ now

LiMiQ sells trust in the evidence layer, not another black-box answer.

LiMiQ answers a practical need hospitals already have: diagnostic-support output must be traceable, reviewable, privacy-governed, and bounded enough for clinicians, legal teams, security teams, and patients to understand what is actually being relied on.

Hospitals

Adopt intelligence without breaking EHR, PACS, compliance, or purchasing reality.

Clinicians

Spend less time hunting for context and more time judging the case.

Patients

Know what is happening, access their scans, and keep their providers aligned.

Private pilot

Start with one workflow where the evidence keeps getting lost.

A useful LiMiQ pilot begins by mapping where clinical context fragments today: PACS review, molecular notes, diagnostic confidence, limitations, reviewer ownership, patient access, or provider communication.

Pilot fit

Bring one diagnostic-support loop into view.

NEXQ can scope LiMiQ around a controlled, non-PHI first conversation, then define data posture, access rules, validation expectations, review ownership, and deployment prerequisites before any regulated exchange.