01
Hospital workflow review
Discuss where NEXQ would fit beside PACS, EHR, oncology boards, molecular review, security review, and procurement gates.
Connect with NEXQ
Let’s talk about your workflow.
Have a workflow question, a research idea, or a pilot to explore? Tell us what you’re working on and where NEXQ might fit.
Your next step
Choose a topic.
Select one below, then choose “Continue by email”.
You’re asking about TumorQ.
Continue by email
Opens your email app with this topic. You can edit the draft before sending.
Keep your first note general. Do not email patient information, credentials, secrets, emergencies, or regulated production data. Approved secure channels and written agreements come before regulated data exchange.
Get to know the work first.
Where we can start
Product, workflow, and research conversations.
A useful first conversation identifies the use case, data posture, care-team workflow, pilot boundary, and governance owner without requiring sensitive patient material.
Tell us where the workflow breaks today: PACS access, delayed imaging context, fragmented molecular data, clinician review burden, patient portal friction, secure provider communication, or treatment-plan handoff. This contact channel is for general, non-PHI inquiries only; approved secure channels and written agreements are required before regulated data exchange.
02
Clinician and research pilot
Define the pilot question, data posture, reviewer roles, evidence boundary, and treatment-plan context.
03
Patient access and security briefing
Review patient-owned scan access, secure provider communication, documented controls, confidentiality expectations, and approved collaboration channels.
Planning a pilot
Four questions to bring with you.
Non-PHI first conversationSecure channel before regulated exchangePilot boundaries before claims
Workflow break
Where does the case slow down today: PACS, EHR context, molecular notes, review ownership, or patient access?
Data posture
What can be discussed publicly, what requires a secure channel, and who owns approval before regulated data moves?
Review loop
Which clinicians, operators, security owners, and governance stakeholders need to inspect the workflow?
Pilot boundary
What should a first private demo prove without overreaching into production, claims, or unsupported reliance?
What helps us prepare
Give the first note just enough shape.
PACS or imaging access frictionDelayed diagnostic evidence reviewFragmented molecular or pathology contextPatient-owned scan access and provider communicationSecurity, retention, audit, or role-access constraintsPilot scope, validation expectations, and governance owner
Direct channels
Sending an inquiry does not create a medical, fiduciary, legal, business-associate, or confidential relationship beyond applicable privacy commitments
Online inquiry form Currently unavailable — please use email
Before we begin
Keep the first note general. Approved secure channels and written agreements come before PHI, regulated datasets, credentials, or confidential production material.
First conversation
A useful demo starts with the real bottleneck.
Contact is where the use case, data posture, provider workflow, pilot boundary, and governance owner become clear.
Review documentationA person first
The work begins before a scan appears on a screen.
Patient signal
Symptoms, imaging, history, constraints, and goals travel together.
Evidence review
Findings stay close to confidence, limitations, and source context.
Plan context
Diagnosis support and care-pathway discussion remain in the same frame.
Secure handoff
Providers, patients, and institutions keep the record moving safely.
NEXQ does not need public PHI to begin. The first step is a general, non-PHI scoping conversation.
Why NEXQ now
A useful first conversation starts with your workflow.
The strongest demo starts with the real operating question: where do scans live, where does context get lost, who reviews the output, and what security boundary must be respected?
Hospitals
Adopt intelligence without breaking EHR, PACS, compliance, or purchasing reality.
Clinicians
Spend less time hunting for context and more time judging the case.
Patients
Know what is happening, access their scans, and keep their providers aligned.